Open Journal Systems

The Cognitive-Functional Properties of English WH-dialogic Constructions in Discourse

Guocai ZENG

Abstract

Within the theoretical frameworks of cognitive linguistics and cognitive construction grammar, this papertakes the pair of a WH-question and one of its answers in contemporary spoken English as the research object and regards such pairs as WH-dialogic constructions. In this study we construct an Event-based Schema-Instance Cognitive Model (ESI model) to analyze the cognitive-functional properties of this category of dialogic constructions. The discoursal expansion and textual cohesion in discourse achieved through the application of such dialogic constructions indicate that the usage of WH-dialogic constructions is one of the basic cognitive strategies for human beings to construe the objective world. 

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baugh, Albert C. and Cable, Thomas. A history of the English Language (3rd Edition) [M]. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. London, Boston and Henley,1978.

Brône, Geert & Elisabeth Zima. Towards a dialogic construction grammar[J], 2014, 25(3): 457-495.

Chomsky, Noam. Syntactic Structures [M]. The Hague: Mouton,1957.

Chomsky, Noam. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax [M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1965.

Chomsky, Noam. Problems of Projection [J]. Lingua, 2013(130):33-49.

Croft, William and Cruse, Alan D. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. CUP, 2004:257-258.

Du Bois, John W. Towards a dialogic syntax [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 2014, 25(3): 359-410.

Ginzburg, Jonathan & Ivan Sag. Interrogative Investigations:The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives [M]. CSLI Publications, 2000: 185.

Goldberg, Adele. E.Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press,1995: 4.

Goldberg, Adele. E. Constructions at Work: the Nature of Generalization in Language [M].OUP, 2006: 3,177.

Hamblin, C. L. Questions in Montague English [J]. Foundations of Language,1973, 10(1): 41-43.

Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. Edward Aarnord(Publishers) Limited,1994: 45-46.

Langacker,R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites [M]. Stanford, California:Stanford University Press, 1987: 371.

Langacker, R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. II: Descriptive Application [M]. Stanford, California:Stanford University Press, 1991: 505-506.

Langacker, R.W. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction[M]. Oxford: OUP,2008: 457,466.

Langacker,R, W. Investigations in Cognitive Gramma [M]. Mouton de Gruyter,2009: 235.

Lehnert, Wendy. Human and computational question answering[J]. Cognitive Science, 1997 (1): 37-73.

Taylor,John. Linguistic Categorization --- Prototypes in Linguistic Theory [M]. OUP,1989:59.

Taylor, John. Cognitive Grammar [M]. OUP, 2002:125.

Thomson, A.J & Martinet, A.V. A Practical English Grammar [M]. OUP, 1986: 71-74.

Zeng, Guocai. A Cognitive Approach to the Event Structures of Grammatical Constructions [J]. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 2015(1):38-42.

Zeng, Guocai. A Cognitive Approach to the Event Structures of WH-Dialogic Constructions[J]. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 2016(4): 311-324.

Zeng, Guocai. Bookreview: The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue[J]. Discourse Studies, 2018a (6): 813-815.

Zeng, Guocai. The Dialogic Turn in Cognitive Linguistics Studies: From Minimalism, Maximalism to Dialogicalism [J]. Cogent Education (Taylor&Francis), 2018b (5): 1537907. (https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1537907)

Davies, Mark. (2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. Available from: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/fls.v1i1.1080
(132 Abstract Views, 127 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.