Open Journal Systems

Investigation into the Research on Doctoral Writing: A Synthesis of Recent Research (2010-2019)


Article ID: 1083
Vol 1, Issue 1, 2019, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 201 (Abstract) 65 (PDF)


Doctoral writing has been concerned by linguistic scholars and the practitioners of English for academic purposes. This review explores the literature on doctoral writing which got published in peer-reviewed international journals of English between 2010 and 2019 to examine three questions: (1) From which perspectives do the recent researches adopt when examining doctoral writing of the ESOL students? (2) What methodology do the authors apply to research doctoral writing? (3) What kind of text or resource was analyzed by the authors? The goal of the review is to provide the pedagogical suggestions to the future teaching of doctoral writing and viable supports for the writing practice of doctoral students by a comprehensive analysis of the current research. After the overall search on Scopus, 210 titles and abstracts have been searched out through a combination of search terms. The inclusion and exclusion criteria have been used to identify the qualified articles for this study and disqualify the possibly irrelevant articles from the included. Ultimately, 82 articles have been confirmed to be further reviewed for the solution of research questions. This review indicates the relationship between doctoral writing and pedagogical and social context is complex, and thus necessary supports from inside and outside of doctoral community need to be given to improve the writing competence of doctoral students.


Doctoral Students; Doctoral Writing; Systematic Review; Scopus

Full Text:



Bartkowski, J.P., Deem, C.S., Ellison, C.G. Publishing in Academic Journals: Strategic Advice for Doctoral Students and Academic Mentors, American Sociologist 2015; 46 (1): 99-115.

Bastalich, W. Beyond the local/general divide: English for academic purposes and process approaches to cross disciplinary, doctoral writing support, Higher Education Research and Development 2011; 30 (4): 449-462.

Bastalich, W., Behrend, M., Bloomfield, R. Is non-subject based research training a 'waste of time', good only for the development of professional skills? An academic literacies perspective, Teaching in Higher Education 2014: 19 (4): 373-384.

Basturkmen, H., East, M., Bitchener, J. Supervisors' on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socializing students into the academic discourse community, Teaching in Higher Education 2014; 19 (4): 432-445.

Burford, J. Conceptualizing doctoral writing as an affective-political practice, International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2017; (12): 17-32.

Can, G., Walker, A. A Model for Doctoral Students' Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Written Feedback for Academic Writing. Research in Higher Education 2011; 52 (5): 508-536.

Can, G., Walker, A. Social science doctoral students' needs and preferences for written feedback, Higher Education 2014; 68 (2): 303-318.

Carter, N. Action research: Improving graduate-level writing, Educational Action Research 2012; 20 (3): 407-421.

Castelló, M., González, D., Iñesta, A. Doctoral students' writing regulation: The impact of socially-shared revision in academic texts. Revista Espanola de Pedagogia 2010; 68 (247): 521-537.

Chang, P. Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: A textlinguistic approach, ReCALL 2012; 24 (2): 209-236.

Chang, P., Tsai, C.-C. EFL doctoral students' conceptions of authorial stance in academic knowledge claims and the tie to epistemic beliefs, Teaching in Higher Education 2014; 19 (5): 525-542.

Chang, P., Schleppegrell, M. Explicit learning of authorial stance-taking by L2 doctoral students, Journal of Writing Research 2016a; 8 (1): 49-79.

Chang, P. EFL Doctoral Students' Conceptions of Authorial Stance in Academic Research Writing: An Exploratory Study, RELC Journal 2016b; 47 (2): 175-192.

Cheng, A. Examining the ‘applied aspirations’ in the ESP genre analysis of published journal articles", Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2019; 38: 36-47.

Chiu, Y.L.T. 'Singing your tune': Genre structure and writer identity in personal statements for doctoral applications, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2016; (21): 48-59.

Colombo, L. Personal ties in the writing of a doctoral dissertation [Los vínculos personales en la producción de tesis doctorales], Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa 2014;16 (2): 81-96.

Creswell, J. W. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). London, UK: SAGE. 2013.

Danvers, E., Hinton-Smith, T., Webb, R. Power, pedagogy and the personal: feminist ethics in facilitating a doctoral writing group, Teaching in Higher Education 2019; 24 (1): 32-46.

Diana, J., Stephen M., et al. The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review. Nurse Education Toay 2018; (60): 84-91.

Dressen-Hammouda, D. Measuring the voice of disciplinarity in scientific writing: A longitudinal exploration of experienced writers in geology, English for Specific Purposes 2014; 34 (1): 14-25.

Eastman, C., Maguire, K. Critical autobiography in the professional doctorate: improving students’ writing through the device of literature, Studies in Continuing Education 2016; 38 (3): 355-372.

Evans, C., Stevenson, K. The learning experiences of international doctoral students with particular reference to nursing students: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010; 47 (2): 239-250.

Freeman,S., Jr. The manuscript dissertation: A means of increasing competitive edge for tenure-track faculty positions. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2018; (13): 273-292.

Fullagar, S., Pavlidis, A., Stadler, R. Critical moments of (UN) doing doctoral supervision: Collaborative writing as rhizomatic practice, Knowledge Cultures 2017; 5 (4): 23-41.

Gao, G., Cao, J. Effects of CLIL on EAP learners: Based on sample analysis of doctoral students of science, International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 2015; 4 (5): 113-123.

González-Ocampo, G., Castelló, M. Writing in doctoral programs: examining supervisors’ perspectives, Higher Education 2018; 76 (3): 387-401.

Guerin, C. Rhizomatic Research cultures, writing groups and academic researcher identities. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2013; (8): 137-150.

Guerin, C., Xafis, V., Doda, D.V. et al. Diversity in collaborative research communities: A multicultural, multidisciplinary thesis writing group in public health, Studies in Continuing Education 2013; 35 (1): 65-81.

Habibie,P. , Hyland, K(eds). Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication: authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillan. 2019.

Hakkarainen, K., Hytönen, K., Lonka, K., et al. How does collaborative authoring in doctoral programs socially shape practices of academic excellence? Talent Development and Excellence 2014; 6 (1): 11-29.

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of the writing process. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1980. p. 3–30.

Inouye, K., McAlpine, L. Developing academic identity: A review of the literature on doctoral writing and feedback, International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2019; (14): 1-31.

Lam, C.K.C., Hoang, C.H., Lau, R.W.K., et al. Experiential learning in doctoral training programs: fostering personal epistemology through collaboration, Studies in Continuing Education 2019; 41 (1): 111-128.

Langum, V., Sullivan, K.P.H. Writing academic English as a doctoral student in Sweden: narrative perspectives, Journal of Second Language Writing 2017; (35): 20-25.

Lei, L. Linking adverbials in academic writing on applied linguistics by Chinese doctoral students, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2012; 11 (3): 267-275.

Lei, J., Hu, G. Doctoral candidates’ dual role as student and expert scholarly writer: An activity theory perspective, English for Specific Purposes 2019; (54): 62-74.

Levchenko, V. Use of corpus-based classroom activities in developing academic awareness in doctoral students, New Educational Review 2017; 48 (2): 28-40.

Li, Y. “Publish SCI papers or no degree”: practices of Chinese doctoral supervisors in response to the publication pressure on science students, Asia Pacific Journal of Education 2016; 36 (4): 545-558.

Lonka, K., Chow, A., Keskinen, J., et al. How to measure PhD. Students' conceptions of academic writing - and are they related to well-being? Journal of Writing Research 2013; 5 (3): 245-269.

Ma, R. Advanced academic literacy development: A case study of a successful Chinese doctoral student, Language, Culture and Curriculum 2019; 32 (2): 207-222.

Ma, L.P.F. Academic writing support through individual consultations: EAL doctoral student experiences and evaluation, Journal of Second Language Writing 2019; 43: 72-79.

Maher, M.A., Feldon, D.F., Timmerman, B.E., et al. Faculty perceptions of common challenges encountered by novice doctoral writers. Higher Education Research and Development 2014; 33 (4): 699-711.

Magyar, A., Robinson-Pant, A. Special issue on university internationalization -Towards transformative change in higher education: Internationalizing doctoral research: Developing theoretical perspectives on practice. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 2011; 17 (6): 663-676.

Mandell, D., Shalan, H., Stalker, C., Caragata, L. Writing for Publication: Assessment of a Course for Social Work Doctoral Students, Journal of Teaching in Social Work 2015; 35 (1-2): 197-212.

Maringe, F., Jenkins, J. Stigma, tensions, and apprehension: The academic writing experience of international students, International Journal of Educational Management 2015; 29 (5): 609-626.

Morton, J., Storch, N. Developing an authorial voice in PhD multilingual student writing: The reader's perspective, Journal of Second Language Writing 2019; 43: 15-23.

Muncie J. Process writing and vocabulary development: comparing Lexical Frequency Profiles across drafts. System 2002; (30): 225-235.

Murphy, S., McGlynn-Stewart, M., Ghafouri, F. Constructing Our Identities through a Writing Support Group: Bridging from Doctoral Students to Teacher Educator Researchers. Studying Teacher Education 2014;10 (3): 239-254.

Narciss, S. Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the interactive tutoring feedback model. Digital Education Review 2013; (23): 7–26.

Negretti, R., McGrath, L. Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course, Journal of Second Language Writing 2018; 40: 12-31.

Odena, O., Burgess, H. How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: a qualitative approach, Studies in Higher Education 2017; 42 (3): 572-590.

Okuda, T., Anderson, T. Second Language Graduate Students’ Experiences at the Writing Center: A Language Socialization Perspective, TESOL Quarterly 2018; 52(2): 391-413.

Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Ravelli, al. Change and stability: Examining the macrostructures of doctoral theses in the visual and performing arts, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2012; 11(4): 332-344.

Raffaella N & McGrath L. Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from anL2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing 2018; (40): 12-31.

Rohan, A., Fullerton, J. Effects of a programme to advance scholarly writing. Clinical Teacher 2018. doi: 10.1111/tct.12979

Schraw G. Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Metacognition in learning and instruction, Springer, Netherlands. 2001.3-16.

Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on college students' academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 2014; 106(2): 331–347.

Stoilescu D., McDougall D. Starting to publish academic research as a doctoral student. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2010 (5).

Stracke, E., Kumar, V. Exploring doctoral students’ perceptions of language use in supervisory written feedback practices - Because “feedback is hard to have”, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 2016; 39(2): 122-138.

Strokova, T.A. Building research competence of PhD students: An analysis of experience of a PhD school, Obrazovanie i Nauka 2018; 20(10): 9-30

Thompson, C., Morton, J., Storch, N. Becoming an applied linguist: A study of authorial voice in international PhD students’ confirmation reports, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 2016; 39(2): 139-157.

Tiago R. K., Patricia A. J. Effects of adaptive training on metacognitive knowledge monitoring ability in computer-based learning. Computers & Education 2019; (129): 92 – 105.

Tonks, A.J., Williams, A.S. Identifying unmet training needs for postgraduate research students in the biomedical sciences through audit of examiners' reports. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2018(13), 169-191.

Tusting, K., Barton, D., McCulloch, S., et al. Researching writing across the lifespan: The value of literacy studies for highlighting social and contextual aspects of change, Writing and Pedagogy 2018; 10(3): 401-422.

Wisker, G. Articulate - academic writing, refereeing editing and publishing our work in learning, teaching and educational development, Innovations in Education and Teaching International 2013; 50(4): 344-356.

(201 Abstract Views, 65 PDF Downloads)


  • There are currently no refbacks.