Open Journal Systems

Contemplative Landscapes: Towards Healthier Built Environments

Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo 1


This review aims to show the current state of the knowledge in the area of the visual quality of landscapes in urbanized areas and their influence on people’s mental health and well-being. This falls under the passive recreation and passive exposure to the environmental stimuli present in our cities (such as walking in nature, quiet contemplation) as opposed to active interactions with the landscapes such as horticulture therapy, meditation, etc. Passive exposure to natural or built environments can shape our mental health patterns throughout the life cycle.

Although we know that the quantity of green spaces in the cities can improve the well-being of city inhabitants and contact with natural environments can alleviate various psychological disorders, it is also likely that the quality of green spaces, including seemingly irrelevant landscape design nuances, can play a more important role for our mental health.

Currently, one can observe a strong demand from policy makers for generating scientific evidence-based knowledge to provide recommendations for urban design and the maintenance of green spaces. The Contemplative Landscape Model (CLM) is an operationalised construct which includes aesthetic, environmental and mental health values of landscapes, and could serve as a useful tool to assist in the current need for knowledge. However, more research with an emphasis on causal relationships is needed.


Contemplative; Landscape; Exposure; Urban; Mental health

Full Text:



Hinshaw SP, Cicchetti D. Stigma and mental disorder: Conceptions of illness, public attitudes, personal disclosure, and social policy. Development and psychopathology 2000 Dec;12(4): 555-98.

Winter DD, Koger S. The Psychology of Environmental Problems: Psychology for Sustainability. Psychology Press; 2014 Apr 4.

Duarte-Tagles H, Salinas-Rodríguez A, Idrovo ÁJ, et al. Biodiversity and depressive symptoms in Mexican adults: Exploration of beneficial environmental effects. Biomédica 2015; 35(SPE): 46-57.

Bloom DE, Kinnunen JU, Korpela K. Exposure to nature versus relaxation during lunch breaks and recovery from work: development and design of an intervention study to improve workers’ health, well-being, work performance and creativity. BMC Public Health 2014; 14(1), 488.

World Health Organization. Mental Health: facing the challenges, building solutions; Report from the WHO European Ministerial Conference, 2005, Helsinki.

World Health Organization. Injuries and violence: the facts, 2014.

Bloom DE, Chisholm D, Llopis E, et al. From burden to ‘best buys': reducing the economic impact of non-communicable disease in low-and middle-income countries; Program on the Global Demography of Aging 2011; No. 7511.

Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C, et al., The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980-−2013. Int. J. Epidemiol 2014; 43: 476–493.

Roux AVD, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010; 1186(1): 125-145.

. Mair CF, Roux AVD, Galea S. Are neighborhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? A critical review. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008 (jech–2007).

Blair A, Ross NA, Gariepy G, et al.How do neighborhoods affect depression outcomes? A realist review and a call for the examination of causal pathways. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol 2014; 49: 873–887.

Helbich M. Toward dynamic urban environmental exposure assessments in mental health research. Environmental research. 2018 Feb 28;161:129-35.

Rao M, Prasad S, Adshead F, Tissera H. The built environment and health. The Lancet. 2007 Sep 29;370(9593):1111-3.

Sarkar C, Webster C, Gallacher J. Healthy cities: public health through urban planning. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2014 Apr 25.

Pardal S. Porto City Park, Idea and Landscape, 2006; Lisbon: GAPTEC

Chiesura A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and urban planning 2004; 68(1): 129–138.

Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. CUP Archive 1991.

Kaplan S. Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior 2001; 33(4): 480-506.

Ulrich B. Theoretische Betrachtung des Ionenkreislaufs in Waldökosystemen. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 1981; 144(6): 647-659.

Ulrich R. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 1984; 224(4647): 420-421.

Ulrich RS. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 1986; 13(0): 29-44.

Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments.Journal of environmental psychology 1991; 11(3): 201-230.

Hartig T, Staats H. Guest editors’ introduction: Restorative environments. Journal of environmental psychology 2003; 23(2): 103-107.

Hartig T, Staats H. The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of environmental psychology 2006, 26(3): 215-226.

Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and behaviour 1991; 23(1): 3-26.

Van den Berg AE, Hartig T, Staats H. Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of social issues 2007; 63(1): 79-96.

Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological science 2008; 19(12): 1207-1212.

Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Öhrström E. Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007; 83(2): 115-126.

Nisbet EK, Zelenski, JM, Murphy SA. Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 2011; 12(2): 303-322.

Ryan RM, Weinstein N, Bernstein J, et al. Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of environmental psychology 2010; 30(2): 159-168. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.009 solutions; Report from the WHO European Ministerial Conference, Helsinki.

SDG, UN. An Action Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. United Nations 2013; acquired on 5.04.2018 from:

National Parks Board. Guidelines on Greenery Provision and Tree Conservation for Developments (2nd ed.), 2018 Singapore, NA.

Victoria-Australia, Ministry for Planning. Planning and Environment Act, 1987; 56.05-2

England N. Nature Nearby: Accessible Natural Greenspace Guidance. London: 2010.

Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D et al. Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: a systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health 2015; 12(4): 4354-4379.

Graça, M, Gonçalves, J, Alves, P, et al. Assessing how green space types affect ecosystem services delivery in Porto, Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning 2018; 170: 195-208.

Fong KC, Hart JE, James P. A Review of Epidemiologic Studies on Greenness and Health: Updated Literature Through 2017. Current environmental health reports 2018; 5(1): 77-87.

Sandifer PA, Sutton-Grier AE, Ward BP. Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services 2015; 12, 1-15.

Zhang L, Tan PY, Diehl JA. A conceptual framework for studying urban green spaces effects on health. Journal of Urban Ecology 2017; 3(1), jux015.

WHO Urban green spaces: a brief for action, web press release, 2017.

Andreucci M, Livoreil B, Guizzo AO, et al. Assessing Relevant Knowledge Related to The Types And Characteristics Of Urban Green & Blue Spaces Having A Significant Impact On Human Mental Health And Well-Being, UNISCAPE Conference Proceedings, Bologna, Italy 2018.

American Institute of Architects AIA. Acquired on 26/6/2018 from

Olszewska-Guizzo AA, Paiva TO, Barbosa F. Effects of 3D Contemplative Landscape Videos on Brain Activity in a Passive Exposure EEG Experiment. Front. Psychiatry 2018; 9:317.

Neale C, Aspinall P, Roe J, et al. The Aging Urban Brain: Analyzing Outdoor Physical Activity Using the Emotiv Affectiv Suite in Older People. Journal of Urban Health 2017; 94(6): 869-880.

Adli M, Berger M, Brakemeier EL, et al. Neurourbanism: towards a new discipline. The Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4(3): 183-185.

Neurolandscape. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from

Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture, ANFA. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from

Neuroscience Applied to Architectural Design, NAAD.Retrieved July 10, 2018, from

Arbib. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from

Olszewska AA, Marques PF, Ryan RL, et al. What makes a landscape contemplative? Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 2016; 45(1): 7-25.

Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3:201–15.

Tan PY, Liao KH, Hwang YH, et al. Nature, Place & People: Forging Connections through the Neighbourhood Landscape Design, 2018; World Scientific, Singapore.

Navickas L, Olszewska AA, Mantadelis T. CLASS: Contemplative landscape automated scoring system. In Control and Automation (MED), 2016 24th Mediterranean Conference on (pp. 1180-1185). IEEE.

United Nations. Population Division, World Urbanization Prospects; 2018, acquired from: on 25 June 2018.

(112 Abstract Views, 41 PDF Downloads)


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.