Open Journal Systems

Smart City Ontologies: Improving the effectiveness of smart city applications

Nicos Komninos, Charalampos Bratsas, Christina Kakderi, Panagiotis Tsarchopoulos

Article ID: 01.001.
Vol 1, Issue 1, 2016, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 626 (Abstract) 687 (PDF)

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of low impact of smart city applications observed in the fields of energy and transport, which constitute high-priority domains for the development of smart cities. However, these are not the only fields where the impact of smart cities has been limited. The paper provides an explanation for the low impact of various individual applications of smart cities and discusses ways of improving their effectiveness. We argue that the impact of applications depends primarily on their ontology, and secondarily on smart technology and programming features. Consequently, we start by creating an overall ontology for the smart city, defining the building blocks of this ontology with respect to the most cited definitions of smart cities, and structuring this ontology with the Protégé 5.0 editor, defining entities, class hierarchy, object properties, and data type properties. We then analyze how the ontologies of a sample of smart city applications fit into the overall Smart City Ontology, the consistency between digital spaces, knowledge processes, city domains targeted by the applications, and the types of innovation that determine their impact. In conclusion, we underline the relationships between innovation and ontology, and discuss how we can improve the effectiveness of smart city applications, combining expert and user-driven ontology design with the integration and or-chestration of applications over platforms and larger city entities such as neighborhoods, districts, clusters, and sectors of city activities.

Keywords

intelligent city; ontology; application; design; innovation; efficiency; impact

Full Text:

PDF

References

Chesbrough H W, 2003, The new imperative for creat-ing and profiting from technology, in Open Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.

Chesbrough H W, 2006, How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape: Open Business Models, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Harvard Business School.

Von Hippel E, 2005, Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge .

Digital disruptors: Models of digital operations, n.d., viewed March 21, 2015,

Komninos Ν, 2014, Smart environments and innovation-for-all strategies, in The Age of Intelligent Cities, Routledge, London and New York.

Amsterdam Smart City, 2015, viewed March 15, 2015,

Amsterdam Smart City, 2011, in Smart stories, Maaike Osieck, Amsterdam, Netherlands, viewed Apr 19, 2011,

Egeler C and Dell G, 2013, Best practices in urban ITS: collection of projects, Urban ITS Expert Group, viewed March 25, 2015,

Caragliu A, Del Bo C S, Kourtit K, et al. Performance of smart cities in the North Sea Basin, viewed March 25, 2015,

Nelson R and Winters S, 1982, in An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Cohnitz D and Smith B, 2003, Assessing ontologies: The question of human origins and its ethical significance. Reprint version of a paper published in Runggal-dier E and Kanzian C (eds), Persons–An Interdisciplinary Approach, Vienna, 243–59.

Noy N F and McGuinness D L, 2001, Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology, Stanford University, viewed March 30, 2001.

Magee L, 2010, A framework for assessing commensurability of semantic web ontologies. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, vol.8(1): 91–102.

Despeyroux T and Trousse B, 2000, Semantic verification of web sites using natural semantics: Proceedings of the sixth Conference on Content-based Multimedia.

Komninos A and Arampatzis A, 2013, Entity ranking as a search engine front-end. International Journal on Advances in Internet Technology, vol.6(1)&(2): 68–78.

Otero-Cerdeira L, Rordiguez-Martinez F R and Gómez- Rodríguez A, 2014, Definition of an ontology matching algorithm for context integration in smart cities. Sensors, vol.14: 23581–23619.

SOFIA2 concepts, 2014, viewed March 3, 2015,

Civic dynamics platform, n.d., viewed March 15, 2015,

Uceda-Sosa R, Srivastava B and Schloss R J, 2012, Us-ing ontologies to make smart cities smarter, IBM Research, viewed June 30, 2012,

Uceda-Sosa R, Srivastava B and Schloss R J, 2011, Building a highly consumable semantic model for smarter cities: Proceedings of the AI for an Intelligent Planet, 3:1–3:8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2018316.2018319.

Miles A and Bechhofer S, 2009, SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference, W3C Recommendation, viewed August 18, 2009,

Bratsas C and Filipidis P, SKOS Representation of NACE statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community, n.d., viewed August 3, 2015,

Komninos N, 2006, The architecture of intelligent cities: integrating human, collective and artificial intelligence to enhance knowledge and innovation: Proceedings of the 2nd IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments, IE 06, vol.1: 13–20, viewed March 23, 2015, Academic OneFile database.

Anthopoulos L G and Vakali A, 2012, Urban planning and smart cities: Interrelations and reciprocities. The Future Internet, vol.7281: 178–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30241-1_16.

Castells M, 1975, La Question Urbaine, Paris, edn, F. Maspero, Pergamon Press, Paris.

Gavrilova T, Gorovoy V and Bolotnikova E, 2012, New ergonomic metrics for educational ontology design and evaluation. New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, vol.246: 361–378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-125-0-361.

Komninos N, Kakderi C and Tsarchopoulos P, 2014, New services design for smart cities: A planning road-map for user-driven innovation: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies for Smart Cities (WiMobCity ‘14): 29–39, viewed March 23, 2015, Academic OneFile database.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2633661.2633664.

Deakin M, 2014, Smart cities: The state-of-the-art and governance challenge. Triple Helix, vol.1(7): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0007-9.

De Jong T and Ferguson-Hessler M G, 1996, Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, vol.31(2): 105–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2.

Deakin M, 2013, Smart Cities: Governing, Modelling and Analysing the Transition. Routledge, New York.

Belissent J, 2010, Getting clever about smart cities: New opportunities require new business models, Forrester for Ventor Strategy Professionals, viewed Novem-ber 2, 2010,

Angelidou M, 2015, Strategic planning for the development of smart cities, thesis, University of Thessaloniki, IKEE / Aristotle University of Thessaloniki – Library, viewed March 11, 2015.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/JSC.2015.01.001
(626 Abstract Views, 687 PDF Downloads)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Nicos Komninos, Charalampos Bratsas, Christina Kakderi, Panagiotis Tsarchopoulos

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


 

Journal of Smart Cities is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. All journal content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.