Open Journal Systems

The research data reproducibility problem solicits a 21st century solution

Bhupinder Bhullar

Article ID: 53
Vol 1, Issue 2, , Article identifier:

VIEWS - 625 (Abstract) 326 (PDF)


Reproducibility is a hallmark of scientific efforts. Estimates indicate that lack of reproducibility of data ranges from 50% to 90% among published research reports. The inability to reproduce major findings of published data confounds new discoveries, and importantly, result in wastage of limited resources in the futile effort to build on these published reports. This poses a challenge to the research community to change the way we approach reproducibility by developing new tools to help progress the reliability of methods and materials we use in our trade.


data reproducibility, scientific method

Full Text:


Included Database


Wikipedia, n.d., Standing on the shoulders of giants, ac-cessed June 25, 2016,

Stern A M, Casadevall A, Steen R G, et al. 2014, Re-search: financial costs and personal consequences of re-search misconduct resulting in retracted publications. eLife, vol.3: e02956.

Ioannidis J P A, Allison D B, Ball C A, et al. 2009, Rep-eatability of published microarray gene expression anal-yses. Nature Genetics, vol.41(2): 149–155.

Prinz F, Schlange T, and Asadullah K, 2011, Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol.10(9): 712.

Begley C G and Ellis L M, 2012, Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, vol.483(7391): 531–533.

Steen R G, 2011, Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? Journal of Medical Ethics, vol.37(11): 688–692.

DeAngelis C D and Fontanarosa P B, 2009, Retraction: Cheng B-Q, et al., Chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008; 299(14): 1669–1677. The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.301(18): 1931.

National Institutes of Health, n.d., NIH Research Training — Rigor & Reproducibility, accessed June 29, 2016,

Fang F C, Casadevall A and Morrison R P, 2011, Re-tracted science and the retraction index. Infection and Immunity, vol.79(10): 3855–3859.

The Open Data Substrate, n.d., accessed June 29, 2016,

(625 Abstract Views, 326 PDF Downloads)


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 Bhupinder Bhullar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




Advances in Precision Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. All journal content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.