Open Journal Systems

Jungian psychology in a demanding modern world

Clarence St.Hilaire

Article ID: 678
Vol 4, Issue 1, 2019, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 712 (Abstract) 1184 (PDF)


This article discusses Jungian psychology as a debated, and exclusionary field of psychology using Carl Jung’s influential work to provide light on analytical or environmental psychology, and to present the theoretical rapprochement between Jungian and Freudian theories[4].  A succinct look at the realm of analytical psychology is still pertinent looking at the role of environmental psychology considering several demands from the modern world. To position Jung in minority spheres, where most of his critics have seen expressions of discrimination, and anti-Semitism, the key principles of Jungian theories will be highlighted considering various researchers to ascertain whether there is limited knowledge for this mindful inquiry[2]. In terms of environmental psychology, Jung’s relevance is important to assess. The many perspectives espoused by Jungian advocates warrant further analysis and research, but are necessary to reflect on today’s societal needs for positive, environmental, humanistic psychology, and potential creation of the psyche as a social transformational tool in psychoanalysis.


Jungian psychology; environmental psychology: Freudian theories: minority researchers; social transformation.

Full Text:


Included Database


Adler G. The living symbol: A case study in the process of individuation. New York, N.Y: Bollingen Foundation, 1961.

Bentz VM, Shapiro JJ. Mindful inquiry in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1998.

Brewster F. African Americans and Jungian psychology: Leaving the shadows. Abingdon, MD: Routledge, 2017.

Casement A. The role played by Gerhardt Adler in the development of analytical psychology internationally, and in the UK. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 2014; 59: 78-97.

Colombos A. 2016. Analytical psychology: The theory of Carl Jung. Retrieved from

Durkheim E. The elementary forms of religious life. New York, N.Y: The Free Press, 1912.

Dyer R. Light of the world. New York, N.Y: Routledge, 1997.

Edwards JE, Caplan RD, Van Harrison R. 1998. Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundation, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. Edwardsetall998.Pdf.,47&as_vis=1

Hunt HT. A collective unconscious reconsidered: Jung’s archetypal imagination in the light of contemporary psychology and social science. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 2012; 57: 76-98.

Jones RA. Jung’s psychology with the psyche and the behavioral sciences. Behavioral Sciences, 2013; 3: 408-417.

Jung CG. Psychological types. London, England: Princeton University Press, 1921.

Kim CY. Carl Gustav Jung and Granville Stanley Hall. On religious experience. Journal of Religious Health, 2016; 55: 1246-1260.

Roesler C. Evidence for the effectiveness of Jungian psychotherapy: A review of empirical studies. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2013; 3: 562-575.

Sedgwick D. On integrating Jungian and other theories. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 2015; 60(4): 540-558.

Sherry J. Beatrice Hinkle and the early history of Jungian psychology in N.Y. Journal of Behavioral. Sciences, 2013; 3: 492-500.

St.Hilaire C. The social dimensions of the preventive efficient stress situation model (PRESS) questionnaire in light of the general self-efficacy, health belief model, the theory of care-seeking behavior, and symbolic interactionism in healthcare. Cogent Social Sciences, 2016; 2: 1-12.

Zingrone NL. 2002. Translate this darkness. The life of Christiana Morgan, the veiled woman in Jung's circle. From

Lewin K. Field theory in social science. (1st ed). London: Tavistock Publications, 1952.

(712 Abstract Views, 1184 PDF Downloads)


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Clarence St.Hilaire

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.