Open Journal Systems

Contemplative Landscapes: Toward Healthier Built Environments

Olszewska-Guizzo Agnieszka Anna

Article ID: 742
Vol 4, Issue 2, 2019, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 420 (Abstract) 264 (PDF)


This review aims to show the current state of knowledge in the area of the visual quality of landscapes in urbanized areas and their influence on people’s mental health and well-being. This falls under the passive recreation and passive exposure to the environmental stimuli present in our cities (such as walking in nature and quiet contemplation) as opposed to active interactions with the landscapes such as horticulture therapy and meditation. Passive exposure to natural or built environments can shape our mental health patterns throughout the life cycle. Although we know that the quantity of green spaces in the cities can improve the well-being of city inhabitants and contact with natural environments can alleviate various psychological disorders, it is also likely that the quality of green spaces, including seemingly irrelevant landscape design nuances, can play a more important role for our mental health. At present, one can observe strong demand from policymakers for generating scientific evidence-based knowledge to provide recommendations for urban design and the maintenance of green spaces. The Contemplative Landscape Model is an operationalized construct which includes esthetic, environmental, and mental health values of landscapes and could serve as a useful tool to assist in the current need for knowledge. However, more research with an emphasis on causal relationships is needed.


Contemplative; Landscape; Exposure; Urban; Mental health

Full Text:


Included Database


Hinshaw SP, Cicchetti D. Stigma and mental disorder: Conceptions of illness, public attitudes, personal disclosure,

and social policy. Development and Psychopathology 2000; 12(4): 555-598.

Koger SM, Winter DD. The Psychology of Environmental Problems: Psychology for Sustainability. New York:

Psychology Press; 2011.

United Nations. Population Division, World Urbanization Prospects; 2018. Available from:

unpd/wup. [Last accessed on 2018 Jun 25].

Duarte-Tagles H, Salinas-Rodríguez A, Idrovo ÁJ, et al. Biodiversity and depressive symptoms in Mexican adults:

Exploration of beneficial environmental effects. Biomédica 2015; 35: 46-57.

De Bloom J, Kinnunen U, Korpela K. Exposure to nature versus relaxation during lunch breaks and recovery from

work: Development and design of an intervention study to improve workers’ health, well-being, work performance

and creativity. BMC Public Health 2014; 14(1): 488.

World Health Organization. Mental Health: Facing the Challenges, Building Solutions. Helsinki: Report from the

WHO European Ministerial Conference; 2005.

World Health Organization. Injuries and Violence: The Facts; 2014.

Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C, et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: A systematic review and

meta-analysis 1980-2013. International Journal of Epidemiology 2014; 43: 476-493.

Roux AVD, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2010; 1186(1):


Mair CF, Roux AVD, Galea S. Are neighborhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? A critical

review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2008; 62: 940-946.

Blair A, Ross NA, Gariepy G, et al. How do neighborhoods affect depression outcomes? A realist review and a call

for the examination of causal pathways. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2014; 49: 873-887.

Helbich M. Toward dynamic urban environmental exposure assessments in mental health research. Environmental

Research 2018; 161: 129-135.

Rao M, Prasad S, Adshead F, et al. The built environment and health. The Lancet 2007; 370(9593): 1111-1113.

Sarkar C, Webster C, Gallacher J. Association between adiposity outcomes and residential density: A full-data,

cross-sectional analysis of 419 562 UK biobank adult participants. The Lancet Planetary Health 2017; 1(7): e277-e288.

Pardal S. Porto City Park, Idea and Landscape. Lisbon: GAPTEC; 2006.

Chiesura A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004; 68(1): 129-138.

Kaplan S. Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior 2001; 33(4):


Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York : CUP Archive; 1989.

Ulrich B. The oretische betrachtung des ionenkreislaufs in waldöko systemen. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 1981; 144(6): 647-659.

Ulrich R. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 1984; 224(4647): 420-421.

Ulrich RS. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 1986; 13: 29-44.

Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal

of Environmental Psychology 1991; 11(3): 201-230.

Hartig T, Mang M, Evans GW. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior

; 23(1): 3-26.

Hartig T, Staats H. Guest editors’ introduction: Restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology

; 23(2): 103-107.

Hartig T, Staats H. The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of

Environmental Psychology 2006; 26(3): 215-226.

Van den Berg AE, Hartig T, Staats H. Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit

of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues 2007; 63(1): 79-96.

Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science 2008;

(12): 1207-1212.

Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Öhrström E. Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of

perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007; 83(2): 115-126.

Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA. Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to

subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 2011; 12(2): 303-322.

Ryan RM, Weinstein N, Bernstein J, et al. Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental

Psychology 2010; 30(2): 159-168.

SDG UN. An Action Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. United

Nations; 2013. Available from:

Development-FINAL.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 May 04].

National Parks Board. Guidelines on Greenery Provision and Tree Conservation for Developments. 2nd ed. Singapore,

NA: National Parks Board; 2018.

Victoria-Australia, Ministry for Planning. Planning and Environment Act, 56.05-2; 1987.

Natural England. Nature Nearby: Accessible Natural Greenspace Guidance. London: Natural England; 2010.

Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D, et al. Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and

blue spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2015; 12(4):


Graça M, Alves P, Gonçalves J, et al. Assessing how green space types affect ecosystem services delivery in Porto,

Portugal. Landscape and Urban Planning 2018; 170: 195-208.

Fong KC, Hart JE, James P. A review of epidemiologic studies on greenness and health: Updated literature through

Current Environmental Health Reports 2018; 5(1): 77-87.

Sandifer PA, Sutton-Grier AE, Ward BP. Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and

human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services

; 12: 1-15.

Zhang L, Tan PY, Diehl JA. A conceptual framework for studying urban green spaces effects on health. Journal of

Urban Ecology 2017; 3(1): jux015.

World Health Organization (WHO). Urban Green Spaces: A Brief for Action. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health

Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2017.

Andreucci M, Livoreil B, Guizzo AO, et al. Assessing Relevant Knowledge Related to the Types and Characteristics

of Urban Green and Blue Spaces Having a Significant Impact on Human Mental Health and Well-Being. Bologna,

Italy: UNISCAPE Conference Proceedings; 2018.

AIA; 2018. Available from:[Last accessed

on 2018 Jun 26].

Olszewska-Guizzo AA, Paiva TO, Barbosa F. Effects of 3D contemplative landscape videos on brain activity in a

passive exposure EEG experiment. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2018; 9: 317.

Neale C, Aspinall P, Roe J, et al. The aging urban brain: Analyzing outdoor physical activity using the emotiv affectiv

suite in older people. Journal of Urban Health 2017; 94(6): 869-880.

Adli M, Berger M, Brakemeier EL, et al. Neurourbanism: Towards a new discipline. The Lancet Psychiatry 2017;

(3): 183-185.

Neurolandscape (n.d.). Available from: [Last retrieved on 2018 Jul 10].

Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture, ANFA (n.d.). Available from: [Last retrieved on

Jul 10].

Neuroscience Applied to Architectural Design, NAAD, (n.d). Available from: [Last

retrieved on 2018 Jul 10].

Arbib, (n.d.). Available from: [Last retrieved on 2018 Jul 10].

Olszewska AA, Marques PF, Ryan RL, et al. What makes a landscape contemplative? Environment and Planning B:Urban Analytics and City Science 2018; 45(1): 7-25.

Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews

Neuroscience 2002; 3: 201-215.

Tan PY, Liao KH, Hwang YH, et al. Nature, Place and People: Forging Connections through the Neighbourhood

Landscape Design. Singapore: World Scientific; 2018.

Navickas L, Olszewska A, Mantadelis T. CLASS: Contemplative Landscape Automated Scoring System. IEEE:

Control and Automation (MED), 2016 24th Mediterranean Conference; 2016. p. 1180-1185.

(420 Abstract Views, 264 PDF Downloads)


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Olszewska-Guizzo Agnieszka Anna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.