Open Journal Systems

Participatory planning processes in Indian cities: its challenges and opportunities

Sudeept Maiti, Joao Villela De Faria

Article ID: 150
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2017, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 465 (Abstract) 457 (PDF)


Historically, India has had strong local governments and probably drawing from this, is the spirit in which the country enacted the 73rd and the 74th constitutional amendment acts (CAA), in 1992[1]. This amendment aimed at a redistribution of powers to enable local bodies which are closer to local issues to respond more quickly and efficiently, rather than relying on a distant central body. However, the practices in participatory planning in Indian cities have been, at best, tokenistic in nature in the face of the challenge of implementing an effective decentralisation processes. The paradigm of citizen engagement and participative planning today must shift from one of the traditional redressal of grievances to that of collaborative solution building bringing both the government and citizen together in the development of local areas. This paper aims to analyse and evaluate participative local area planning practices in India, particularly at the level of the smallest administrative unit, i.e. wards. The study has been categorised in mainly two aspects: institutionalised and non-institutionalised processes dealing with participation at the bottommost rung of planning. This study is an attempt to highlight successful models of engagement, institutional structure and processes that allow for effective participatory planning and to identify possible ways of overcoming challenges of inclusiveness, budgeting and financing and the disconnect between citizens and administration in this process.


Local area planning; Ward Committees; fair representation; budgeting; citizen engagement; Citizen-led initiatives; 74th amendment

Full Text:


Included Database


TERI. (July 2010). Enhancing public participation through effective functioning of Area Sabhas. the Energy and research Institute.

BAUD, I., & Nainan, N. (2008). “Negotiated spaces” for representation in Mumbai:ward committes, advanced locality management and polictics of middle class activism. Environment & Urbanization, Vol 20(2): 483–499.

Institute of Social Sciences. (2006). People's Participation in Urban Governance - a comparative study of the working of wards committees in Karnataka, Kerela, Maharashtra and West Bengal. Concept Publishing Company.

West Bengal Department of Municipal Affairs. (n.d.). The West Bengal Municipal (Ward Committee) Rule, 2001. Retrieved from West Bengal Department of Municipal Affair:

Department of Municipal Affairs, Government of West Bengal. (n.d.). Ward committee rules 2001. Retrieved from Department of Municipal Affairs, Government of West Bengal:

Ahluwalia, I. J. (n.d.). Icrier:Urbanisation. Retrieved from

USAID. (April 2008). Preparation of Local Area Plans: Pilot project for Delhi, India. The Commuities Group International(TCGI) in partnersip with AECOM.

Rajesh, K. (June 2009). Participatory Institutions and People’s Practices in India: An analysis of Decentralisation experiences in Kerala State. Bangalore: Institute for Social and Economic Change.

United Nations. (n.d.). Building Bridges through Participatory Planning - Part 1. Romania Foundation for local development (FPDL).

BBMP. (2010). Documents:BBMP Budget 2010, ward-wise special grants. Retrieved from SCRIBD:

United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2001). Decentralisation in India Challenges & Opportunities. UNDP, Human Development Resource Centre (HDRC). New Delhi: UNDP.

Connelly, S. (September 2002). Public involvement in Local Agenda 21: the impact of local authority policy processes. University of Sheffield , Department of Town and Regional Planning. University of Sheffield .

Leena, D., & Sharma, A. (2007). Government by the people, Analysing 74th Constitutional Amendment Act 1992. Hazards Centre. Hazards Centre.

Isaac, T. T., & Franke, R. W. (2002). Local Democracy and Development: The Kerala People’s Campaign for Decentralized Planning; Campaign for Democratic Decentralization in Kerala. New York, USA: Rowman and Littlefeild Publishers INC.

Isaac, T. T. (12 January, 2000). Campaign for Democratic Decentralisation in Kerala: An Assessment From The Perspective Of Empowered Deliberative Democracy. Centre for Development Studies and Kerala State Planning Board .

Chamaraj, K. (2014, November 17). articles:Citizen matters. Retrieved from Citizen matters:

Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2011). Re-visioning Indian Cities: The Urban Renewal Mission. SAGE Publications.

Goyal, M. (2015, Nov 09). Economy:Infrastructure. Retrieved from Economic Times:

Arnstein, S. ( July 1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of American Institute of Planners, No. 4,Vol. 35, pp. 216-224.

Idicula, M. (2016, August 23). Opinion:Columns. Retrieved from The Hindu:

Ministry of Law and Justice, India. (n.d.). Constitution of India: Amendment acts. Retrieved from India Code Legislative Department:

Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. ( Jan/Feb 2004). Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? Public Administration Review, 55.

Aijaz, R. (December 2015, Issue no. 118). Social Marginalisation in India and role of the State. Observer Research Foundation Issue Brief, 7.

Ramachandran, M. (2014). India's Urban Confusion: Challenges and Strategies. New Delhi: Copal Publishing Group.

Free Press Journal. (2015, Jan 10). Form Mohalla Samiti on pilot basis: HC to IMC. Retrieved from Free Press Journal:

Hamid, A. (2004). 74th Amendment: An Overview . Centre for Civil Society Research Internship Papers .

George, M. S. (2007,September). An Introduction to Local Self Governments In Kerala. Thiruvananthapuram: SDS CAPDECK.

Roy, U. K., & Ganguly, M. (2009). Integration of Top down & Bottom up approach in Urban and Regional Planning:West Bengal Experience of Draft Development Plans (DDP) and beyond. National Town & Country Planners Congress, Goa: India.

Mohanan Pillai, C. P. (2016. February). Social Classes and Participation in Local Planning in Kerela: A Micro Level Study. Thiruvanathapuram: RESEARCH UNIT ON LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENTS.

Centre for Urban and Regional Studies . (2008). DIGITAL TOOLS IN PARTICIPATORY PLANNING. Aalto: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies Publications .

Chernoff, M. (n.d.). Resources:Open government. Retrieved from Opensource:

Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2006). Peoples participation in Urban Governance. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

Namma Bangluru Foundation. (n.d.). Study on the functioning of the Ward Committees in Bangalore. Retrieved from Namma Bengaluru:

World Bank. (2016). Social Development - Social Accountability E-guide. Retrieved from The World Bank:

School of Planning and Architecture. (n.d.). Alternative approaches to Masterplan. School of Planning and Architecture. School of Planning and Architecture.

Kundu, D. (2011, March 5). Elite Capture in Participatory Urban Governance. Economic & Political Weekly EPW, xlvi no 10.

Delhi Government. (n.d.). Bhagidari. Retrieved from Website of the Delhi Government:

Harriss, J. (2010, May). ‘Participation’ and Contestation in the Governance of Indian Cities. Simons Papers in Security and Development, 17.

Centre for Environment Education. (August 2007). Participatory Budgeting in Pune:A Documentation of the Process undertaken by the Pune Municipal Corporation in 2006-07for the 2007-08 Municipal Budget. Centre for Environment Education. Centre for Environment Education.

Menon, S., Madhale, A., & Amarnath. (August 2013). Participatory Budgeting in Pune: A critical review. Centre for Environmental Education. Centre for Environmental Education.

Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2011). Re-visioning Indian Cities: The Urban Renewal Mission. Sage Publications.

(465 Abstract Views, 457 PDF Downloads)


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Sudeept Maiti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.