Open Journal Systems

Strategies to harness Bengaluru’s solar potential

Ashok Thanikonda, Deepak Krishnan

Article ID: 152
Vol 2, Issue 1, 2017, Article identifier:

VIEWS - 199 (Abstract) 188 (PDF)


Solar energy is a key component of cities’ climate mitigation and energy security plans, due to its ease of installation & operation and drastic decline in costs.

In Bengaluru, residential, commercial and industrial (C & I) consumers contributed to around 85% of the electricity consumption and resultant emissions during 2014 and 2015. What are the options for these consumers within the ambit of current policies to procure solar power? Are changes required in these policies to scale up the adoption of solar power?

WRI India has explored two possible options – off-site and on-site procurement of solar energy.

On-site procurement

In 2013, net-metering which allows export of excess power to the grid was not available in Bengaluru. This, in addition to expensive electricity storage options meant that the complete potential of an on-site solar plant could not be realized.

WRII has found that net-metering regulations for rooftop solar projects in Karnataka, introduced in November 2014, were met with moderate success among C & I consumers. The adoption among residential consumers was slow due to information gaps about financial parameters, net-metering procedures and credible installers.

On May 2, 2016 gross metering scheme is introduced for both categories of consumers. WRII intends to look into the effectiveness of the new scheme.

Off-site solar procurement

Grid-connected solar power projects in Karnataka, commissioned before 31 March 2018, were exempted from payment of wheeling, banking charges and cross subsidy surcharge for the first 10 years for sale to 3rd party customers.

Since the typical payback period for a utility scale solar project is around 7 years, this order provided long term clarity for investors, solar project developers and consumers. For certain categories of consumers (commercial), the exemption meant that solar energy became more viable. 

However, challenges in procuring land and bottlenecks in power evacuation, may delay the large scale deployment of solar projects to the latter half of 2016.


Bengaluru;solar;on-site; off-site; roof-top; policy; residential; commercial; industrial

Full Text:


Included Database


John C, Peter P, Jon C, et al. 2016 Leadership by US Cities: Innovation in Climate Action, Innovation Network for Communities; Bloomberg Philanthropies, viewed 15 May 2016,

CDP 2015, Can cities quit fossil fuels?, viewed 15 May 2015,

Ramachandra TV, Bharath H. Aithal, Bengaluru’s reality: Towards unlivable status with unplanned

urban trajectory, viewed 14 July 2016,

Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Bangalore, State and Domestic Product of Karnataka 2014-15, viewed 11 November 2016,

The Times of India, Karnataka contribution to India's GDP has increased, viewed 11 November 2016,

The Economic and Statistical Organization, Punjab, State Wise Data, viewed 08 November 2016,

BESCOM 2015, MYT for 4th control period (FY19-FY21), viewed 15 May 2016,

BESCOM 2015, 13th annual report of BESCOM for the financial year 2014-15, viewed 15 May 2016,

Deccan Herald, Widening power deficit causing longer outages, viewed 15 May 2016,

KREDL, RE cumulative report, viewed 08 August 2016,

Deepak K, Ashok T 2015, Assessing the Impact of Karnataka Electric Regulatory Commission’s Open Access Order for Solar Power Generators in Karnataka, WRI India, viewed 15 May 2016,

Government of Karnataka, Solar Policy 2014-2021, viewed 15 May 2016,

Government of Karnataka, Solar Policy 2014-2021 (revised), viewed 08 August 2016,

KERC, Determination of tariff and other norms for Solar Rooftop and Small Photovoltaic Power Plants, viewed 08 August 16,

Aruna Kumarankandath, Karnataka launches gross metering for solar rooftop, Down To Earth, viewed 08 August 16

KREDL, RE progress report, viewed 08 August 16,

KERC, Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions for Open Access) Regulations, 2004., viewed on 23 July 2016,

KPMG 2016, Union Budget 2016: Energy and Natural Resources, viewed on 23 July 2016,

KERC, Determination of Tariff for grid interactive solar power plants including rooftop and

small solar Photo voltaic power plants, viewed on 08 August 16,

KERC, Retail Supply Tariff approved by K.E.R.C. in Tariff Order for the year 2013 -14 For BESCOM, viewed on 08 August 16,

BESCOM 2015, Tariff booklet 2015-16, viewed on 15 May 2016,

Ashok T, Deepak K 2016, Corporate Renewable Energy (RE) Procurement Guide: Why and how?, WRI India, viewed on 23 May 2016,

Deepak K 2015, India’s Supreme Court Reinforces Renewable Energy Targets for Industry, World Resources Institute, viewed on 15 May 2016,

Ashok T, Deepak K 2015, Aggregating Demand for Corporate Rooftop Solar Installations: Lessons from the Collaborative Solar PV Procurement Project, WRI India, viewed on 15 May 2016,

KERC 2014, Wheeling charges, Banking charges & Cross Subsidy Surcharge for Solar Power

Generators, viewed 15 May 2016,

KERC 2013, Determination of Tariff for grid interactive solar power plants including rooftop and

small solar Photo voltaic power plants, viewed 15 May 2016,

Sarah M, Joshua R 2016, Prosumers in Bengaluru: Lessons for scaling rooftop solar PV, World Resources Institute, viewed 15 May 2016,


(199 Abstract Views, 188 PDF Downloads)


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Ashok Thanikonda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.